Making the wrong thing faster still leaves you doing the wrong thing. Cutting it frees you entirely.
— Not the Epilogue, Part IV · Focus
Most of us don’t struggle to get things done. We struggle to tell the difference between a task that deserves to be faster and a task that deserves to disappear. That confusion is expensive, because speed is seductive. It feels like progress. It gives you a little hit of competence every time you shave five minutes off something. But if the something was never worth doing, you’ve just built a faster road to nowhere.
The optimization trap
Optimization is easier than elimination, and that’s exactly why we default to it. Cutting a task means making a judgment call about its value, and judgment calls are uncomfortable. They require you to admit that something you’ve been doing — maybe for years — didn’t need to happen at all. Speeding it up avoids that discomfort entirely. You get to feel productive without ever asking the harder question.
People build elaborate systems to answer emails faster, batch errands more efficiently, or streamline meetings that shouldn’t exist in the first place. The system works. The meeting still shouldn’t exist. All that cleverness gets spent defending a task instead of examining it.
Try this: Take one recurring task from your week — something you do without thinking, like a status report, a check-in call, a weekly review. Before you look for ways to do it faster, ask a blunter question: what would actually happen if you stopped doing this for a month? Not “is it useful” — almost everything is a little useful. Ask what breaks. Often the honest answer is: very little, or nothing you’d notice.
Cutting is a skill, not a mood
People treat cutting like it requires a burst of ruthlessness — a New Year’s resolution, a dramatic declutter, a moment of clarity that supposedly arrives on its own. It doesn’t usually work that way. Cutting is a skill you build through repetition, like any other. The first time you eliminate something, it feels risky. The tenth time, it feels like maintenance.
The trick is to make cutting small and frequent instead of large and rare. You don’t need to overhaul your calendar in one afternoon. You need a habit of asking, on a regular basis, which of your current obligations you’d refuse if someone proposed them to you today, cold, with no history attached. History is the thing that protects bad tasks. It lets you say “well, we’ve always done it this way” instead of “this is still worth doing.”
Try this: Once a week, pick the least interesting thing on your calendar. Not the hardest — the dullest, the one you’d forget you did five minutes later. Ask whether it earns its place because it matters, or because it’s inertia wearing the costume of responsibility. If it’s inertia, cancel it once and watch what happens before you decide whether to bring it back.
The afternoon is the point
There’s a reason to anchor this idea to an afternoon and not a philosophy. Time reclaimed in the abstract doesn’t mean much — “more time for what matters” is a phrase people nod at and then forget. But an actual afternoon, empty and unclaimed, is concrete. You can feel it. You can use it to read, to think, to see someone, to do the one thing you keep saying you don’t have time for.
That’s the real cost of optimizing the wrong task: it’s not just wasted effort, it’s a stolen afternoon, week after week, quietly disappearing into something that was never going to matter no matter how fast you did it. Cutting isn’t about discipline for its own sake. It’s about getting that afternoon back and noticing, honestly, what you do with it once it’s yours.
Try this: After you cut something, don’t immediately fill the space with another task. Leave it open for a week and pay attention to what you’re drawn toward when nothing is demanding your time. That pull is information. It tells you what your unoptimized, uncluttered attention actually wants — which is usually a better guide to your second curve than any productivity system.
Not the Epilogue goes further into this, in its chapter on reclaiming your time. But the essential move is the one above: before you make something faster, ask if it deserves to exist at all. That question, asked honestly and often, will save you more time than any system built to answer it quickly.
Go deeper. Not the Epilogue takes this further. Start with the free Not the Epilogue starter: one page, no signup.